tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post6363398397040786107..comments2024-03-21T19:08:05.737-07:00Comments on Genealogy's Star: Searching for the Family History LibraryJames Tannerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-28722483099339091592015-12-08T16:03:28.892-07:002015-12-08T16:03:28.892-07:00Yes, the data could reflect a change in the way se...Yes, the data could reflect a change in the way searches are made, but why don'e other subject show the same decline?James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-44861941215612227522015-12-08T14:05:20.819-07:002015-12-08T14:05:20.819-07:00The question would be - is that really reflective ...The question would be - is that really reflective of genealogy participation? Or is the real truth that the branding behind Familysearch has made the success of their website more prominent than the FHL in Salt Lake? <br /><br />I don't know anyone who searches for the FHL directly. Everyone goes to FamilySearch's website first, then clicks on the link to the library. Therefore, that would skew the Google Trends because their data isn't captured.Crafting in Yoohoovillehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08223824425648008880noreply@blogger.com