tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post6389428311240833684..comments2024-03-21T19:08:05.737-07:00Comments on Genealogy's Star: FamilySearch announces Milestones for retiring New.FamilySearch.orgJames Tannerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-31970391716455915302014-11-12T21:32:25.941-07:002014-11-12T21:32:25.941-07:00I am writing a series of follow up posts on this i...I am writing a series of follow up posts on this issue. I will get to it as soon as I can get back to Provo and my computer. James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-46897473992928561792014-11-11T18:55:40.787-07:002014-11-11T18:55:40.787-07:00From your quote of the FS blog post: "However...From your quote of the FS blog post: "However, there are still many tasks that our engineers will continue to work on, such as migrating and synchronizing datasets to Family Tree, as well as verifying and validating all data."<br /><br />I have yet to see migrated data that has been verified (with evidence given) and recognizably validated. Instead, I see oft-repeated erroneous changes in correct and evidence-cited FT data, in addition to frequent conflation of completely different persons (wildly different dates/places in addition to just plain totally different names).<br /><br />Did the quote mean that the folks working on the n.FS migration are going to go back and fix all the wrong stuff they put into FS-FT?? That would take another few years, at least.Geoloverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12050268303916428230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-90361876646136036062014-11-11T17:53:12.729-07:002014-11-11T17:53:12.729-07:00As I indicated in my comment previously, I am addr...As I indicated in my comment previously, I am addressing the issue you mention and others in a series of blog posts I started today. James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-90674769073448257412014-11-11T17:29:13.204-07:002014-11-11T17:29:13.204-07:00If I'm remembering correctly, I believe nFS wa...If I'm remembering correctly, I believe nFS was rolled out in 2007. Interesting how it will have taken nearly a decade for FS to unwind nFS and replace it with a viable application.Ted Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09810743230086342147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-21079159299281862832014-11-11T17:20:42.705-07:002014-11-11T17:20:42.705-07:00I am in the process of writing a post about the is...I am in the process of writing a post about the issues and will include an explanation of the locking issue. It may take me a couple of days. Thanks for your comment.James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-80535122370276477512014-11-11T08:54:03.355-07:002014-11-11T08:54:03.355-07:00James, I wish sometime you would comment on those ...James, I wish sometime you would comment on those persons in the FamilySearch trees that cannot be altered - they will not merge, nor can you change relationships. In some cases there is very wrong material - such as the wrong sex for some of those New England given names - or other "facts" that have long since been proved quite different by more thorough research. Why are these persons "locked" and how do they receive that status?Kay Hadenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16775054088464354234noreply@blogger.com