tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post669021046714885037..comments2024-03-07T23:20:49.790-07:00Comments on Genealogy's Star: Another View of FamilySearch Family TreeJames Tannerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-81505730706069722102013-01-10T16:29:19.655-07:002013-01-10T16:29:19.655-07:00It is my understanding that in some cases, FamilyS...It is my understanding that in some cases, FamilySearch volunteers are working on correcting the duplicates and other problems inherited from the data coming from New.FamilySearch.org. I know this is the case because some of my relatives are locked and the information continues to be corrected and updated. They are dedicated to eliminating all duplicate records. I hope this helps. James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-21218779141872371102013-01-10T12:10:34.113-07:002013-01-10T12:10:34.113-07:00Your daughter said you would be willing to answer ...Your daughter said you would be willing to answer questions about Family Tree, so I'm going to take her up on that.<br /><br /><br />I'm a fan of the new features of Family Tree, but am stumped when it comes to doing the equivalent of NFS's separating records. I have encountered one record (which I cannot point to because it has been mysteriously fixed) that was clearly a mashup of at least three different people. I knew how to fix that in NFS, and I know that you can undo certain actions performed by other people in Family Tree. But finding those actions is virtually impossible and even then they cannot always be undone. <br /><br />As an alternative, I could simply delete all of the information that does not pertain to the person I am interested in, but I fear that such an approach would hide any trace of the other real people who had been merged in. <br /><br />What do you suggest?Last Lemmingnoreply@blogger.com