tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post3681829247673666424..comments2024-03-21T19:08:05.737-07:00Comments on Genealogy's Star: A MyHeritage.com UpdateJames Tannerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-65127962690508625582016-01-14T07:41:08.028-07:002016-01-14T07:41:08.028-07:00My answer is to focus on the individuals and famil...My answer is to focus on the individuals and families you are researching and ignore the rest for the time being until you need to use the hints for further research. James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-7634492720644812202016-01-14T07:21:46.473-07:002016-01-14T07:21:46.473-07:00James, I feel lucky that my Smart matches are only...James, I feel lucky that my Smart matches are only at around 1,400. Even at that, I just don't have time to go through that many people to see if there is anything new to add to my tree. In the past I have checked a few on occasion but found mostly that the lines were very distant to mine and most of the researchers engaged were not related themselves to me. I think, to alleviate this problem I may have to (should) cut back on the number of people I have on the site. That might stop some of the traffic. The biggest bug-a-boo to MyHeritage is that no one could possible find the time or energy to confirm all the matches or risk end up having no time to work on other things. I don't know what the answer is to this dilemma. Discover Genealogyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10751791688359495496noreply@blogger.com