Pages

Saturday, July 11, 2020

A New Rule of Genealogy Discovered: Number Thirteen



Here are the previous 12 Rules.
  • Rule One: When the baby was born, the mother was there.
  • Rule Two: Absence of an obituary or death record does not mean the person is still alive.
  • Rule Three: Every person who ever lived has a unique birth order and a unique set of biological parents.
  • Rule Four: There are always more records.
  • Rule Five: You cannot get blood out of a turnip. 
  • Rule Six: Records move. 
  • Rule Seven: Water and genealogical information flow downhill
  • Rule Eight: Everything in genealogy is connected (butterfly)
  • Rule Nine: There are patterns everywhere
  • Rule Ten: Read the fine print
  • Rule Eleven: Even a perfect fit can be wrong
  • Rule Twelve: The end is always there
As I said back in November of 2019, you never know, there might be another rule somewhere out there in the genealogical universe waiting to be discovered. Well, here it is:

Rule Thirteen: Genealogists abhor a blank field

Other than my obvious borrowing from the old scientific saying from physics known as, horror vacui, or plenism, commonly stated as "nature abhors a vacuum," attributed to Aristotle, this came to me as I was correcting entries in the FamilySearch.org Family Tree. It seems like some genealogists are compelled to fill in a blank even if they have no idea what should go there. Hmm. I might say that some people are compelled to fill in a blank even if they have no idea what should go there and not attribute all that extra stuff to genealogists but in my experience, it is genealogists that obsess over empty fields such as birthdates before there could possibly have been any birth records. 

Genealogy should be source-based. This means that when we add information (an event) to our family tree, it should be based on a valid historical source not just our speculation about the event. You might want to look at Rule Two (above) and think about the fact that empty fields may simply reflect the last of a record and not a failing on the part of the researcher. 

Take some time to think about what you are adding to your own family tree and take some more time to think about what you add to an online public family tree. 


5 comments:

  1. You really should link to your blog posts about each rule...just trying to help when you find #14 and #15.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like I need to do an index to the Rules. Good Idea. Thanks Randy.

      Delete
  2. Re: Rule Number 1, mother is always present at time of birth of child. With the advent of surrogate mothers, this is no longer true. The virus recently exposed that many women had hired surrogate mothers in Eastern Europe to carry their embryos and because of the restrictions to travel were unable to be present at the birth of their child, birth legal and biological. The child will have a birth record from the Eastern European Country and I presume a US birth certificate issued by state department for someone born abroad. I don't know what name appears as the mother on the Eastern European Country birth record.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Especially a name field. Thus we get UNKNOWN, MRS. JOHN DOE, NN, NLN and unless there is a true person to merge these people with, there is no way to get rid of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There will always be a degree of clutter and unresolvable mysteries that is one of the benefits (by products) of doing genealogical research

      Delete