First of all, quoting from their website:
Family History Information Standards Organisation is a community-driven organisation established for the purpose of developing genealogy and family history information standards on a modern platform that isAt least part of the FHISO organization (they spell their word "organisation" using English spelling) has been very vocal, FHISO organiser Tony Proctor of the Parallax View blog, has been posting regularly about the issues surrounding genealogical data standardization. From my perspective, Tony almost seems to be the lone voice in the wilderness with about the right mixture of computer programmer and genealogist.
- Open
- Multi-stakeholder
- International
- Self-governing
- Balanced
Consistent with my previous views on the subject of genealogical data standardization, I think that practical implementation speaks louder than words. There is no question that an agreement between two or more major genealogical database providers for standards in the method of file transfer would speak louder than all the discussion going on. I just thought it would be a good idea to weigh in on this subject from time to time. I would love to hear that progress is being made.
I thought about this recently also... they appointed a leader, Drew Smith, and everything is quiet.
ReplyDeleteGEDCOM is only one of the standards they were going to work on. Seems to me that GEDCOM X will eventually be the default standard if there is no other option. All of the software guys will go for it (and some have already with Certified Share to the FSFT). Will Ancestry, or MyHeritage? They both have agreements with FS now.
I am not sure as to the extent of the sharing agreements with the Ancestry.com and MyHeritage.com. I guess we will have to see what happens and deduce the agreements from the sharing.
DeleteHi James,
ReplyDeleteProgress in FHISO since July has indeed been going on, although it's the type of progress that has to do with creating a foundation for the organisation. Things like moving the website to a more collaborative platform (necessary for the work of FHISO), updating filings with state government agencies (the usual paperwork), and advertising to fill a few vacant board positions (such as the Co-coordinator for the Technical Standing Committee). It's all important work for FHISO, but not especially flashy. So all I can ask of everyone is: Stay tuned. Drew Smith, FHISO Chair
I figured you folks were out there. I just thought you might need some equal time with GEDCOM X.
DeleteThanks for the mention James but I'd just like to clarify that although I was an organising member of FHISO, neither my blog nor STEMMA are connected with them.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry if I didn't make that clear. Thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow.
Delete