Posts
Introduction: The Lie of the Neat and Tidy Family Tree
Open any popular genealogy software, and you’ll be greeted by a familiar sight: a clean, branching chart. Your name is at the bottom, connected to a neat box for one mother and one father. Their lines extend upward to their own parents, creating a perfect, symmetrical pedigree. This structure feels intuitive, almost universal. It’s the model of family that most of us in the Western world take for granted as the fundamental way to record human lineage.
But this tidy framework, known to anthropologists as the "Eskimo" kinship system, is a lie of omission. The surprising truth is that this nuclear-family-centric model is a minority practice on a global scale. For the vast majority of human history and across countless cultures, the "rules" of family have been radically different—systems where aunts are mothers, cousins are siblings, and a child can have multiple biological fathers.
This isn't just an academic curiosity; it represents a fundamental flaw in the tools we use to document our shared past. As our digital tools become more powerful, this blind spot becomes more dangerous, erasing the very relationships that define identity for millions.
As genealogical research transitions from an antiquarian hobby to a sophisticated data science driven by genomics and global digitization, the inability of standard tools to accurately represent non-Western family structures has become a critical point of failure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Your "Cousin" Is Actually Your "Brother" (And You Can't Marry Them)
In the Hawaiian kinship system, the rules are radically inclusive. All females of your parents' generation—your biological mother, your mother's sisters, and your father's sisters—are all called "Mother." Likewise, all males of that generation—your biological father, your father's brothers, and your mother's brothers—are "Father." Consequently, all of their children—what we would call cousins—are your "Brothers" and "Sisters." This creates a massive disambiguation challenge for a genealogist, who might encounter an oral history mentioning "five fathers" and mistakenly assume it's a biological absurdity rather than a description of a close-knit network of uncles.
The Iroquois system introduces another layer of complexity with its distinction between "parallel cousins" and "cross-cousins." Parallel cousins are the children of your mother’s sister or your father’s brother—essentially, the children of your parents' same-sex siblings. In this system, they are considered your "Siblings." Cross-cousins, on the other hand, are the children of your mother’s brother or your father’s sister.
This distinction has a crucial impact on social rules, particularly marriage. Marrying a parallel cousin is a form of incest, a strict taboo, because they are considered your siblings, reinforcing the solidarity of your mother's or father's lineage. Yet, marrying a cross-cousin is often considered the social ideal, as it links two different lineages together. For a genealogist, the dilemma is stark. If they accurately record the social relationship—labeling parallel cousins as "siblings"—the software may flag it as an error suggesting "duplicate parents." They are forced to either erase the cultural truth or break the software's logic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. A Child Can Have More Than One Biological Father
Standard genealogical software is built on a biological axiom: one child has one genetic mother and one genetic father. However, in some Amazonian societies like the Bari and the Aché, this is not a cultural truth. They practice what anthropologists call "Partible Paternity," the belief that a fetus is formed by the cumulative accumulation of semen. If a woman has sexual relations with multiple men during her pregnancy, all of them are considered biological co-genitors of the child.
This is not a symbolic or "fictive" relationship; these co-fathers share the responsibilities of protecting and providing for the child. The tangible benefits of this system are profound: research shows that children with multiple recognized fathers have significantly higher survival rates. Yet, this entire biological and social reality breaks the architecture of modern genealogy.
"Standard genealogy software (GEDCOM) enforces a 1 Child : 1 Father relationship constraint. A researcher documenting a Bari family cannot accurately record the child's paternity... This forces the data to lie about the emic reality of the child's conception and upbringing."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Time Gets Warped: Your "Grandmother" Could Be Your Cousin
Imagine interviewing an elder who points to a five-year-old boy and introduces him as your "uncle." This isn't a joke; it's a structural reality that would send any conventional genealogist into a state of chronological shock. In the Crow and Omaha kinship systems, terminology is used to reflect a person's status within a lineage, not their biological age. This practice, known as "generational skewing," can create what appears to be a warped and illogical family timeline.
In the matrilineal Crow system, the skewing occurs on the father's side. A person’s cross-cousins—the children of their father's sister—are elevated in status to reflect their importance in the father's matrilineage. Her son might be called "Father," and her daughter might be called "Grandmother" or "Aunt," regardless of her actual age.
The patrilineal Omaha system is a mirror image, with the skewing happening on the mother's side. Here, a man's male cross-cousin (his mother's brother's son) is called "Uncle," even if that "uncle" is still a small child. For a genealogist attempting to build a timeline, relying on these kinship terms to estimate birth years would introduce catastrophic errors, potentially misplacing entire branches of the family by decades.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Kinship Can Be Made of Milk, Not Just Blood
In Islamic law, a powerful and permanent kinship can be formed through breastfeeding, a concept known as "Milk Kinship" or Rida'a. When a woman breastfeeds a child who is not her own, she becomes the child's "Milk Mother." Her husband becomes the "Milk Father," and her biological children become the nursed child's "Milk Siblings."
The social impact of this bond is profound. It creates a marriage taboo that is just as strong as a biological one. A person is forbidden from marrying their milk-siblings, their milk-mother, or any of the relations that would be prohibited by blood. This practice forms vast, invisible kinship networks that have historically regulated marriage markets and social alliances.
For a genealogist, this is a "ghost" relationship. It carries the legal and social weight of blood but is rarely recorded in official civil registries. Tellingly, there is no standard tag in the GEDCOM data format to record a milk relationship. The software, blind to the emic reality of milk kinship, has no way to see this powerful bond, rendering this crucial social fact invisible to our primary tools of record.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Your Ancestor Might Be a Canoe
For the Māori people of New Zealand, "Whakapapa" is a concept far broader than the Western idea of genealogy. While it traces human descent, it also functions as a complete taxonomy of the universe, connecting people to the divine, the landscape, and even significant objects.
Whakapapa traces descent not just from human ancestors but from the earth and sky, linking individuals to specific mountains, rivers, and flora. In this cosmology, non-human entities can be foundational ancestors. For example, a historical record might list "'Teaukura,' a canoe," as an ancestor. This is because the canoe represents the journey, the technology, and the spirit that brought a lineage to its home.
This worldview doesn't just bend the rules of genealogy; it represents a conceptual collision so profound that our software mistakes a sacred origin point for a data-entry error. A Western pedigree narrows as it goes back in time, focusing on a specific line of human ancestors. Whakapapa expands, connecting outwards to the entire cosmos. Standard software, which expects human attributes like birth and death dates, flags these non-human ancestors as errors, forcing the user to fight against the tool to record their truth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion: Beyond the Family Tree
These five examples reveal a humbling truth: our standard genealogical tools are not universal instruments of historical record. They are cultural artifacts, products of a Western, nuclear-family logic that they project onto the rest of the world. The software we use, and the familiar "family tree" it produces, acts as a Procrustean bed, distorting and even severing the complex, beautiful, and diverse ways that human beings have structured their families for millennia.
Escaping this Procrustean bed requires more than a software patch; it demands a decolonization of our data, a conscious effort to design tools that listen to a culture's truth before imposing their own. It means recognizing that "family" is not always defined by blood, and that our digital tools must learn to record the truth of a culture, not just the data it can easily process. The "Family Tree" is a powerful metaphor, but what relationships in our own past have been lost or ignored simply because they didn't fit on one of its branches?
Selected citations
https://openstax.org/books/introduction-anthropology/pages/11-1-what-is-kinship
https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/anthropology/kinship-terminology
https://journals.indianapolis.iu.edu/index.php/ias/article/view/6747
https://journals.openedition.org/aof/339?lang=en
https://cargocollective.com/barnabybennett/Whakapapa-and-Architecture
https://nni.arizona.edu/our-work/research-policy-analysis/indigenous-data-sovereignty-governance
https://teara.govt.nz/en/whakapapa-genealogy
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3614654/
https://fiveable.me/key-terms/introduction-cultural-anthropology/eskimo-kinship-system
