Some people eat, sleep and chew gum, I do genealogy and write...

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

FamilyTreeWebinars add Closed Captioning to Webinars

FamilyTreeWebinars.com Closed Captioning

In what well may be the first time the larger genealogical community has provided closed captioning, FamilyTreeWebinars.com in conjunction with MyHeritage.com, who acquired the company last year, have developed and provided closed captioning for 207 past webinars. Quoting from the Press Release dated December 6, 2018:
Legacy Family Tree Webinars, the leading genealogy and DNA webinar platform, announced today the addition of closed captioning to its service. Implemented as a full human-curated transcription via synced subtitles, closed captioning is now available as an option for all live and members-only webinar recordings released since May 1, 2018. In addition, the most popular 50 webinars on the platform and all MyHeritage-specific webinars have been captioned. Legacy will add captioning to all new webinars going forward.
In explaining MyHeritage's involvement, Gilad Japhet is quoted as saying:
“When we acquired Legacy last year, we promised to invest resources to improve the webinar platform and increase its reach, while maintaining its high quality and unique character”, said Gilad Japhet, founder and CEO of MyHeritage. “The addition of closed captioning makes good on this promise and, with translated captioning coming up soon, will help make the webinars accessible to millions of people in Europe and other countries, true to MyHeritage’s goal of making genealogy and DNA testing available to huge consumer audiences worldwide”. 
Access to the closed captioning is available on the Legacy FamilyTreeWebinars.com website.

https://familytreewebinars.com/archived_webinars_by_caption.php

MyHeritage Featured on the Dr. Phil Show

https://www.drphil.com/videos/dr-phils-surprise-family-connection-found-with-myheritage-dna/
Quoting from the Dr. Phil website:
Dr. Phil says he was always aware of his Irish ancestry, but it wasn’t until he submitted a simple cheek swab to MyHeritage DNA that he realized there was more to his lineage.  
“Dr. Phil, we found that you have three distinct ethnicities in six distinct countries,” says MyHeritage consultant Yvette Corporon.
 I do not watch TV but I am aware of Dr. Phil. The like to his website includes a video of the segment of his show when he learns about the results of his MyHeritage.com DNA Test. Here is what the MyHeritage test found:
We revealed to Dr. Phil, interesting insights into his family history and from his DNA. Dr. Phil discovered that he is Irish, Scottish, and Welsh (64.3%), English (28.4%), and Iberian (7.3%). He also received 20,000 DNA matches to MyHeritage users from 64 different countries! 
We also explored the lives of some of his ancestors, including his great-great-grandfather who fought in the Mexican war, information about his grandfather, yearbook photos for triplet aunts and uncle, and a surprising family connection to a well known individual.
To see the segment of the show click Here.

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Expanded Commentary on the Rules of Genealogy: Rule Three


I published the first six Rules of Genealogy back on July 1, 2014. See "Six of the Basic Rules of Genealogy." This short list included the most famous and basic rule of genealogy: "When the baby was born, the mother was there." I added four rules in a post back on August 11, 2017, entitled, "New Rules Added to the old: The Rules of Genealogy Revisited." One more Rule was added to the list on August 2, 2018, in a post entitled, "A New Rule Added: The Rules of Genealogy Revisited Again." You can go back to these original posts to see my original comments and the entire list of Rules.

In this series, I am reviewing each of the Rules and expanding on the reasoning and background of each.

Rule Three: Every person who ever lived has a unique birth order and a unique set of biological parents.

This Rule addresses the challenge of adoptions, foster children, guardianships, stepchildren, and other relationships that may exist in different times and different cultures. You might not see the importance of this Rule unless you have struggled with the identity of an ancestor that may or may not belong in a family. In the recent past, this Rule has been reinforced by the ascendancy of DNA testing as an accepted part of genealogical research. Many of my friends and acquaintances have been surprised to find that the traditional view of their ancestry is not supported by their DNA test. This is particularly true of those who have discovered that they were adopted or that one of their "known" ancestors was not actually their genetic ancestor.

This Rule also implies the need to be acquainted with the changes in the laws of adoption over the years. Adoption in the United States can be divided into two major time periods: before and after the passage of the first modern adoption laws beginning in 1851. In both eras, the idea of protecting the child from knowledge of the adoption has, in many cases, made determining the ancestry of an adoptive child extremely difficult. For example, a tradition in my family was that a particular ancestor was "adopted." After searching for years, I found one church record with the notation that he was adopted. It was only with the advent of online digitized records that we found a likely set of parents for this individual. In this particular case, DNA testing was not reasonably available and in any event, an extensive DNA test among his descendants would not identify his parents.

Here are a few links to websites with information about the history of adoption in the United States. Adoption laws are likely unique in almost every other country in the world.
So why do we have to be reminded that every person has a unique birth order as well as a unique set of biological parents?

It is apparent from looking at online family trees that there are a multitude of "opinions" about the biological makeup of some families. Here is an extreme example from the FamilySearch.org Family Tree:


In this case, the list goes on. One of the entries here has the following:


You might look at the dates given in this particular entry. At least three of the children were born after the listed wife's death date. Rule Six is aimed at this common type of error. There is no reason to list all of these potential wives. Obviously, some extensive research is needed before the identity and relationship of these people can be decided. It might be interesting to note that many of the people listed have multiple record sources. 

There are multiple considerations that need to be taken into account before concluding that a child is the child of a particular set of parents. Fundamentally, the birth and death dates of the parents and date of the birth of the child should always be considered. Adoption may be more difficult to detect but continued research or in some cases, DNA testing, may indicate that a child was adopted. 

As is the case with all of the basic Rules of Genealogy, this Rule is a reminder that obvious relationships may not be accurate. 

Saturday, December 8, 2018

Maryland: State Archives: Wonderful Local Sources for Genealogical Research

Maryland Hall of Records
My wife and I spent the last year (2018) digitizing probate records for FamilySearch at the Maryland State Archives in Annapolis, Maryland. Ultimately, those digital records will be available both at the Archives and on the FamilySearch.org website. If you want to have an in-depth view of working at the Archives, you can find that in my blog series entitled, "A Family History Mission." If you do a Google search for that title with my name, you will see almost 100 posts about our experiences at the archives. You can also see the following webinar on the BYU Family History Library YouTube Channel.


A Family History Mission: Digitizing Records for Family Search by James Tanner

While working at the Archives, I gained a valuable appreciation for the work of conserving and preserving important genealogical records. Our work at the Archives also gave us an appreciation for the difficulty of creating and maintaining a working archive.

https://msa.maryland.gov/

The Maryland State Archives is known as "The Hall of Records." It is located just outside of the historic downtown area of Annapolis, Maryland and adjacent to the United States Naval Academy in the Dr. Edward C. Papenfuse State Archives Building, 350 Rowe Blvd, Annapolis, MD 21401. The Archives features an active outreach program and is open for researchers six days a week except for state and national holidays. As with any government agency, it is best to double check if the Archives will be open before traveling to the facility.

We functioned as volunteers in the Archives and worked a regular shift of 8:00 to 4:30 five days a week. We were primarily involved in preparing individual documents for digitization and then digitizing those same documents plus digitizing large court record books. The focus of the FamilySearch digitization project was probate records from the Maryland State Orphans Court. The Project covers all of the counties in Maryland. Records from the individual counties were being transported to the Archives for the Project. The Project is designed to continue for many years. When we arrived, the Project had been ongoing for about five years and it will continue many years into the future.

Here is a short description of the records from the Archives' website:
The State Archives serves as the central depository for government records of permanent value. Its holdings date from Maryland's founding in 1634, and include colonial and state executive, legislative, and judicial records; county probate, land, and court records; church records; business records; state publications and reports; and special collections of private papers, maps, photographs, and newspapers.
We handled records dating back into the mid-1700s many of the earlier records have already been digitized. This brings up an important point about State Archives. When planning a research trip to an archive, take the time to do some extensive searching online before traveling to the physical location. The digitized records may be available online from one or more of the large online genealogy websites, or may even be available from the archives' websites by searching. The Maryland State Archives has an extensive catalog of records online but the vast majority of those records are only available by visiting the Archives building and asking to see the original records. Some of the digital records are also only available from computers in the Archives building. Another example of the need to physically visit the Archives is the fact that they still maintain a huge paper-based card catalog that contains entries by individual's names as well as by category of records.

Like many other archives around the country, the Maryland State Archives has a web page dedicated to genealogy or family history.

https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/homepage/html/family.html


The Archives' website also has links to their digital resources:

https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/homepage/html/online_records.html

There is also a valuable website about the online resources entitled, "Archives of Maryland Online."

http://aomol.msa.maryland.gov/html/index.html
My time working at the Archives gave me a graphic example of the reality of records searching in the United States. Despite the huge number of commonly available online records, there is still an unimaginably large number of valuable documents that can be accessed and viewed only by physically visiting the repositories. For example, the probate records we were digitizing contained comprehensive information about entire families, but this information is not likely available anywhere else and until all the records are digitized, there is still a need to look through the individual records even if at some time in the future the main entries are indexed. It is not likely that all the names in these documents will ever be completely indexed.

If you would like a good overview of the Maryland State Archives, you can see a number of videos on their YouTube.com Channel.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHfsJ4ZyklZTGKWshJDsemw
The Archives also has a continuing outreach program called Lunch and Learn.

https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/homepage/html/upcomingevents.html
As with every state archives, it is a good idea to spend some time getting acquainted with all the online offerings. 

Thursday, December 6, 2018

Add The Family History Guide to your AmazonSmile Account


Here is a short description of AmazonSmile (Smile.Amazon.com):
AmazonSmile is a simple and automatic way for you to support your favorite charitable organization every time you shop, at no cost to you. When you shop at smile.amazon.com, you’ll find the exact same low prices, vast selection and convenient shopping experience as Amazon.com, with the added bonus that Amazon will donate a portion of the purchase price to your favorite charitable organization. You can choose from over one million organizations to support.
So how can you support genealogy with AmazonSmile? Simple. Designate The Family History Guide Association as the recipient. The Family History Guide Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) non-profit charitable organization and all contributions go to support The Family History Guide a free educational program for teaching and learning about genealogy. Your contribution can help you feel good about buying stuff on Amazon. However, if you need a tax deduction, the AmazonSmile contribution is not deductible to you, the money comes from the Amazon Foundation. But you can get a tax deduction by making a contribution directly to The Family History Guide Association.

Go to Smile.Amazon.com and designate The Family History Guide Association as the recipient. You will be helping to educate and support the thousands of users of The Family History Guide. If you are already a user of The Family History Guide, then signing up with AmazonSmile.com will help you pay back a small portion of your benefit from the program.

If you still have any questions, please review this page of The Family History Guide Association website.

https://thefhguide.com/about-assoc.html
Yes, I am the Chairman of the Board of Directors of The Family History Guide Association and my wife, Ann, is also on the Board. If you are attending RootsTech 2019 this next year, please stop by our booth and say hello or learn how you can maximize your effectiveness as a genealogist using The Family History Guide for free. The Family History Guide can only be free because of people like you who donate directly or indirectly.

thefhguide.com

What do you really know about your ancestors?


One of my main activities is helping individuals discover their ancestral past. I have found that this is best done on a one-on-one basis sitting in front of their computer (or one in a Family History Center) and systematically working backward in time looking at what is already recorded. Of course, I do find people all the time who have nothing recorded, not even their own parents. But usually, there is a place to start talking about who these people were who are called our ancestors. Almost uniformly, unless the person has been working on their own genealogy for some time, the person knows next to nothing about anyone beyond their own parents and from time to time, I find people who do not know anything about their parents, even their parents' names.

Why are so many people disconnected from their ancestral heritage?

My early years were spent in a very small town and I had lots of "relatives" that included uncles, aunts, cousins, and various other people who were supposed to be related to me in some way. As new people showed up at our house to visit or to talk to my parents, I was told that they were related some way. But until I got personally interested in genealogy, I really did not know who these people were or how they were related to me. Of course, there was always someone who could rattle off all the relationships, but I didn't understand who all these people really were.

I was married with a number of children before I began to unravel these relationships. In my case, because of our religious and cultural background, once I focused on the relationships, everything fell into place and I could visualize the relationships. But going to a family reunion can still be a challenge. When you get dozens of people together, all of whom are supposed to be related to you in some way, it can be a real challenge to keep everyone straight especially if you don't see or associate with these relatives on a regular basis.

But now let's move back a bit. One question I always ask prospective genealogists is the names of their grandparents and great-grandparents. If those names appear on an online family tree, they can read me the names, but otherwise, very few people know the complete names of all their great-grandparents and can tell me where they lived and where they were born without looking at some reference provided to them by someone else. If I move back one more generation, these people are totally lost.

If someone knows about a grandparent or great-grandparent, or even further back, it is usually the "surname line" that is well known. For example, if I quiz them about the identities of their great-grandmother's parents, they are totally lost. People usually do not know even the maiden names of grandparents.

Now, before you start getting all huffy about how you can name all of your ancestors individually back to Adam, I would suggest we go a little bit further and ask some more questions.

The crucial questions I always ask is where did these people live? When I ask this question, I am searching to find out exactly where they lived not just that they came from Georgia or Michigan or somewhere back East. The beginning of identifying your ancestors is learning about who they were but the beginning of learning about them and properly and accurately identifying them is learning about exactly where they lived. Yes, I do mean exactly down to the house or farm or tenement or village or town.

I start out with questions about where each of the ancestors was born. When I get a vague or missing answer, I know where to start in helping the person really discover their ancestors. Interestingly, many people get frustrated with my questions and say something like, well, its all written down right here or my mother knew all that so why are you asking me these questions? I guess the basic reason is that they are the same questions I had to ask myself many years ago when I got started.

Let me give an example. My surname family has a strong identity and tradition going back to my 3rd great-grandfather, John Tanner. I continually meet people who identify me as a relative by my surname. But if I ask these same people to tell me who their grandparents were going back to John Tanner, they cannot do so. They say all they know is that they are descendants of John Tanner and that usually ends the conversation.

Now, why is all this important? Because once some genealogists get started, all they do is collect names. I frequently hear about a genealogist who has added thousands of names to their family tree or even some who add thousands of names every year. How is this possible other than by collecting names like you would look at billboards on a freeway? Can you possibly remember or know who these people are as they flash by? How can you possibly know the accuracy of all these entries? Of course, you could just assume that everyone with your surname is related to you and add them willy-nilly to your family tree, but is this really genealogy? Is genealogy really a competition sport where the winner is the person with the most names listed?

So here we have two extremes: people who don't know who their parents are and people who have tens of thousands of "relatives" listed in extensive family trees. But guess what? They both have exactly the same problem. They know little or nothing about their ancestors.

Then there is the common response to this issue: why do we care? Why is family important?

I have spent a long time thinking about the answers to both of these questions and I have come to the conclusion that given our brief mortal existence here on this earth, family is one of the few things that really is important. Granted, I am a genealogist. Granted, I have spent a good portion of my life learning about my own ancestors. Granted, not everyone has the inclination, time, or cares to find out about their family but even if you just a soon not know about your family, you are still part of that family and they are a part of you and will come a time to all of us when all that really matters is our family.

If you don't know about your own family, fortunately, the tools to find your family are now abundantly available and they include DNA testing, online family trees that connect families, and many other wonderful resources.

I guess, when it is all said and done, that I keep going doing my own research and helping others with theirs for the simple reason that as I connect with my own family and see others connect with their family, I see how it changes our lives and how we view the world. Ultimately, we find that we are all related and that differences in race, religion, politics and other things really don't matter. We are all related.

But it does help to understand how we are related.

Monday, December 3, 2018

Why I Quote Wikipedia

Wikipedia.org
If you read any number of my blog posts, you may wonder why I use and quote Wikipedia. The answer to that question involves a number of levels of research and legal considerations which mostly revolve around copyright restrictions. The reasons I use Wikipedia also have extensive implications about why I use wiki-based genealogy programs.

Years ago, there was a controversy about the accuracy of Wikipedia and other wikis. The subject of the controversy was whether or not an online "encyclopedia" could be as accurate as a paper encyclopedia such as the Encyclopedia Britannica. The whole question seems a little bit ridiculous today since there is no question that Wikipedia has an unimaginable amount of information compared to the old paper-based encyclopedias. The real problem, however, was and is that the old encyclopedias were copyright protected. If you go to the Encyclopedia Britannica website I just linked to, you will see the copyright notification at the bottom of the page. In other words, the issue isn't just accuracy, it is primarily copyright protection. Wikipedia's Terms of Use require the information to be either in the public domain or under a free and open use license. It is as simple (and complicated) as that.

The greater issue of the accuracy of wikis is still a matter of some controversy. The wiki-type program implies and involves collaborative contributions that are freely editable by any registered user. The content is either moderated by some sponsoring organization or collaboratively watched and moderated by the wiki's users. There are also situations where moderation involves both the sponsor and the users. The larger genealogy community has a number of wiki-based websites such as the FamilySearch.org Family Tree, WikiTree.com, and Geni.com. There is some degree of hand-wringing among genealogists over the fact that wikis are subject to user editing. Although the mechanisms for moderation vary, the main idea of the wiki is that the users will correct any inaccurate information.

Unfortunately, there is a segment of the potential users of wikis that believe that they are inherently inaccurate, incomplete, and therefore unreliable because of this user involvement and the fact that the entries are not static but can be changed. Unknowingly, these detractors are simply expressing the same arguments and doubts about the reliability of wikis that were rampant during their early development. I have been addressing this issue for many years. For example, see "Can the FamilySearch Family Tree become an accurate master reference?" back in 2016 or another post entitled, "Is Wikipedia a Genealogical Source?"

If I were using a paper resource such as a printed encyclopedia and I found a mistake or inaccurate statement, there is nothing that I could reasonably do to correct the information. If I find the same type of inaccurate information in a wiki, I can research the correct information and change the entry and at the same time provide a link to the original source where I obtained the correct information. This is the real difference between the idea of paper sources and the malleability of wikis. In a sense, they are living, breathing entities that can evolve as new information and corrections are made.

Do wikis become more accurate or less accurate over time? There is an extremely extensive and important article in Wikipedia on the subject entitled, "Reliability of Wikipedia." I am not going to quote the entire article but I will point out that the article concludes that wikis and Wikipedia, in particular, are self-correcting and tend to become more accurate over time. There are currently 249 source citations to the article.

Back to the issue of the genealogical wikis. They are wikis. They will have a tendency to become more complete and more accurate over time. If you want to rant about the changes in the FamilySearch.org Family Tree, read the above article on the Reliability of Wikipedia and look at every one of the sources before you make a comment about why you would never put "your" information in the Family Tree or any other wiki-based program.

The main issues with changes on Wikipedia revolve around controversial celebrities, political, and religious issues. These are areas of controversy in the FamilySearch.org Family Tree also, primarily with people who are "famous" or who were significant immigrants or other categories. Dismissing the Family Tree because of change is really putting your faith in a chimera. You could only dismiss a wiki program for accuracy if your own "information" was absolutely correct in all respects and you were entirely unwilling to share your information and you did not want to face the prospect that someone else may have information that is more correct than your own. When I get complaints about rampant changes on the Family Tree as the excuse for not participating, I simply respond that, yes, you do have correct errors, but that over time, the errors and changes diminish as the community comes to a consensus.

Genealogical research is always open-ended. There is always the possibility that one more document, record, or analysis will change an entry. Change is inevitable.

Genealogists are predominantly reclusive and claim ownership of their research and are thereby protective of that research. They are threatened by the possibility that their information may be lost but are frequently unwilling or unable to provide a clear way to share and preserve their information. Many genealogists are in the "I am going to publish a book about my ancestors" mode and some of them actually do publish such a book. Many of those who have published a book have stacks of copies of the book that they are trying to "sell off" to pay for the publication and cannot give away. Of course, not all genealogists fall into all of these categories, but I do not have to go far for examples. Professional genealogists are fixated on protecting their research because of their need to sell the results to make a living. Everything they publish must be tightly controlled and copyright protected and they are fierce in protecting their copyright claims.

All of the people with these attitudes towards genealogical research feel threatened by wiki-based, online family trees. They primarily object to and are threatened by the fact that wikis can be changed when the basic strength of all wikis is the fact that they can be edited and changed. They are also concerned that "their" information will be lost. As a side note, there is a lot of genealogical information out there on paper that needs to be corrected and lost. This fear of loss, however, does not extend to backing up their data or providing for its preservation when they die.

I quote Wikipedia for the same reasons I use the FamilySearch.org Family Tree. Ultimately, I trust both venues because my experience has led me to trust them. No, they are not perfect, but they can be corrected and ultimately, the information in them both will be preserved and corrected and become unimaginably complete. Like the quote attributed to President Harry S. Truman, "if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." I would add and don't rant about the kitchen and those of us who can stand the heat. Our gain -- Your loss.