Some people eat, sleep and chew gum, I do genealogy and write...

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Looking Back at a Year With Google Photos


For about a year now, I have been using Google Photos to backup all of the photos on my various devices. Because I have been taking a lot of photos with my iPhone 8 Plus, using Google Photos has extremely simplified storing, viewing, and using the photos. The process is simple, you take a photo and Google backs it up online and all of the backed up photos can be viewed using the Google Photos app or online at Photos.Google.com.

The photo storage is free and unlimited. The photos are all organized automatically with a sliding timeline so you can instantly move back to any particular day or year. I have hundreds of thousands of photos on my computer and attached hard drives and all of these are now available to me anyplace and anytime I have an internet connection. However, I would suggest that having this many photos is not easily managed with a program like Google Photos. To really manage these photos, you need a high powered program such as Adobe Lightroom which is part of the Adobe Creative Cloud and has a monthly subscription charge.

For a genealogist, Google Photos simplifies the process of obtaining copies of documents and taking notes assuming the record repository allows photos. When we recently went to the Library of Congress, they suggested taking notes with a smartphone camera. Here is an example of images of a document taken with my iPhone camera and available almost instantly on Google Photos.


Google Photos has a simplified photo editing capability, but any serious editing would require another program. If you are a professional photographer and taking photos at a very high resolution, you need to know that Google reduces the photos to around 16 Megapixels for storage.

There are features for sharing your photos and creating albums. I further suggest reading all the instructions before starting. For more information, you may wish to browse the Official Google Photos blog.

Monday, May 7, 2018

Special Webinar with MyHeritage's Founder and CEO Gilad Japhet

https://blog.myheritage.com/2018/05/watch-special-webinar-with-myheritages-founder-and-ceo/
This is a very special webinar from MyHeritage.com. Here is a short synopsis of the broadcast. 
Gilad shared the story of how he originally caught the “genealogy bug” and the journey of starting MyHeritage and recruiting the original team. Filled with personal anecdotes, he included key milestones and lessons learned along the way, including the intriguing story of a 70-year-old mystery, a highlight of his genealogy experiences. 
He also explained the background of the Legacy acquisition and shared new developments coming up for Legacy Family Tree — the company and the webinar series — and future plans for MyHeritage. 
In this webinar, you’ll get the scoop from Gilad first-hand about new feature releases you can expect later this year...
 This a chance to hear from the head of the soon-to-be largest genealogy company in the world.

Sunday, May 6, 2018

Surprises at the Washington, DC Family History Center Conference

http://wdcfhc.org/wordpress/
On the 5th of May, my wife and I presented at the Washington, D.C. Family History Center Conference in Kensington, Maryland. We each taught two classes and I also presented the Keynote. There were about 300 people in attendance and it was a lovely conference. We are very grateful for the opportunity we had to meet and talk to so many wonderful genealogists.

Now the surprises. When I teach at a conference, I regularly ask people how many of them are familiar with or using MyHeritage.com. When I started asking this question the response would be almost no one, maybe two or three people in the back of the room. At this conference, I am estimating that close to 90% of the people indicated they were using the program. This is a major shift in the use of an online genealogy and an indication of the effectiveness of MyHeritage.com's usefulness as a website. Although once you subscribe to MyHeritage.com you will get a lot of followup email, they have pretty much avoided saturated media advertising. But I think the response now shows a real interest in the program rather than a response to any advertising effort.

As a group, I found the Conference attendees to be more involved generally in serious genealogical research than when I teach more casual or invited groups of people. The level of questions and discussion that I overheard were more specific and not an indication that the participants were novices or uninformed. This may be a reflection of the area. The attendees also appeared to be as diverse a group of people as I have seen at any conference previously.

One thing that was not surprising and mostly confirms again some of the things I have been writing is that there were virtually no younger people at the Conference. Some of the attendees might have been as old as I am.

Thanks to the organizers and participants for a wonderful one-day conference. They did a great job of organizing and supporting a really nice conference.

Saturday, May 5, 2018

Anne Arundel County DNA Bootcamp for Members


The Anne Arundel Genealogical Society has an extensive file of Audio classes for its members. It recently acquired a full recording of the DNA Bootcamp. Here is the announcement.
AAGS members now have access to six DNA Bootcamps, presented by genetic genealogist Mary Eberle and genealogist and blogger Thomas MacEntee, on the following topics:
  • Getting Started with DNA and Genealogy
  • Additional DNA Tools and Concepts
  • Interpreting Your AncestryDNA Results
  • Interpreting Your FTDNA and 23andMe Results
  • Solving Family Mysteries with DNA
  • Finding Birth Families Using DNA
Each Bootcamp includes two webinar recordings and several handouts. The Bootcamps are only accessible to our members who are logged in to our website. Once you have logged in, a new item, "DNA Bootcamps", will appear on the menu to the left. Click on it to access the Bootcamps. If you have any trouble logging in to our site or accessing the Bootcamps, please contact us at web@aagensoc.org. We also welcome your feedback on the Bootcamps, and your suggestions for future member benefits.
You can join the AAGS by clicking on this link and have access to these recordings and many others.

Join AAGS

Thursday, May 3, 2018

Copying Tombstone Inscriptions



Many of the "traditional" ways of preserving the information on tombstones or headstones in a cemetery are destructive and ill-advised. For example, here is a quote from the 2016 New Hampshire Revised Statutes, Title XXVI - CEMETERIES; BURIALS; DEAD BODIES, Chapter 289 - CEMETERIES, Section 289:22 - Stone Rubbings.
289:22 Stone Rubbings. – No person shall make gravestone rubbings in any municipal cemetery or burial ground without first obtaining the written permission of the town selectmen or the mayor of a city or designee. Before granting such permission, the selectmen or mayor will ascertain to the best of their ability that the person making the request knows the proper precautions to be taken and the proper materials to be used for this activity. The town selectmen or city mayor or their designee shall notify the cemetery trustees of the request and its disposition. Any person who violates the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
I ran across this statute in a blog post that did not quote the statute but claimed that making Stone Rubbings was illegal in New Hampshire. Obviously, it is not, but it is regulated. I have also read several references that claim that gravestone rubbings are "illegal" in Massachusetts. I did find the following section in the General Laws, Part IV, Title I, Chapter 272, Section 73:
Section 73. Whoever wilfully destroys, mutilates, defaces, injures or removes a tomb, monument, gravestone, American flag, veteran's grave marker, metal plaque, veteran's commemorative flag holder, commemorative flag holder representing service in a police or fire department, veteran's flag holder that commemorates a particular war, conflict or period of service or flag, or other structure or thing which is placed or designed for a memorial of the dead, or a fence railing, curb or other thing which is intended for the protection or ornament of a structure or thing before mentioned or of an enclosure for the burial of the dead, or wilfully removes, destroys, mutilates, cuts, breaks or injures a tree, shrub or plant placed or being within such enclosure, or wantonly or maliciously disturbs the contents of a tomb or a grave, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or by imprisonment in the jail or house of correction for not more than two and one-half years and by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars. In addition, the court shall order any person convicted of an offense pursuant to this section to pay restitution to the owner of the property that was damaged, destroyed, mutilated, defaced, injured or removed.
I don't see anything in the statute that applies to gravestone rubbings assuming the grave marker was not damaged. Here is a link to an extensive article discussing the pros and cons to gravestone rubbings: "A defense of grave rubbing: fun but controversial." It looks like the writer of the article check some of the same sources I found online.

OK, the image I have above shows a rubbing done with a new technology. The media is Carboff Paper. It seems to be available only from a few sources online, but it is specifically designed for use on stone or other materials without leaving any residue or damaging the surface. However, the physical act of copying a stone inscription can cause damage.

I guess I would suggest that you obtain the permission of the owner or caretaker of any cemetery markers you wish to preserve in this way. I would also suggest that photographs are probably more appropriate. But I cannot find any reference to a statute that makes the activity illegal per se.

If you are aware of the statute please leave a comment and give a full citation to the current state or local law. 

Speaking Up from the Silent Generation


Just recently, I realized that I was a member of the "Silent Generation." This realization caused me a degree of consternation because I am anything but silent. This awareness came about from reading about a study published on May 3, 2018, entitled, "Millennials stand out for their technology use, but older generations also embrace digital life." A summary of the study indicates the following:
More than nine-in-ten Millennials (92%) own smartphones, compared with 85% of Gen Xers (those who turn ages 38 to 53 this year), 67% of Baby Boomers (ages 54 to 72) and 30% of the Silent Generation (ages 73 to 90), according to a new analysis of Pew Research Center data. Similarly, the vast majority of Millennials (85%) say they use social media. For instance, significantly larger shares of Millennials have adopted relatively new platforms such as Instagram (52%) and Snapchat (47%) than older generations have.
These statistics are interesting to silent me because of the demographics of those involved heavily in genealogy. Here is a further comment from the study;
Although Boomers have been enthusiastically adopting a range of technologies in recent years, members of the Silent Generation are less likely to have done so. Three-in-ten Silents (30%) report owning a smartphone, and fewer (25%) indicate that they have a tablet computer or use social media (23%). Previous Pew Research Center surveys have found that the oldest adults face some unique barriers to adopting new technologies – from a lack of confidence in using new technologies, to physical challenges manipulating various devices.
What are those unique barriers? Well, go to a genealogy conference and you can see all of them well exhibited. Here is a quote from the study about the barriers entitled, "Barriers to adoption and attitudes towards technology."
For example, just 26% of internet users ages 65 and over say they feel very confident when using computers, smartphones or other electronic devices to do the things they need to do online, according to a 2015 Pew Research Center survey. Roughly one-third describe themselves as only a little (23%) or not at all (11%) confident in their ability to use electronic devices to do necessary online activities.
Genealogy is not a backwater of technology. For many years now, technology has been revolutionizing genealogical research. The disconnect is between the "traditional" methodology that has been engrained in genealogy for more than a hundred years and the realities of online research. As I have written many times before, the times are changing. When an online genealogy company such as MyHeritage.com now has over 9 billion records online, the idea that we start doing genealogy with a paper pedigree chart and a trip to the local courthouse or archive begs this reality.

The modern model of genealogical research starts with a family tree hosted on a major genealogy program, preferably one with embedded collaboration. I fully realize that as a silent generation member, I have no real standing to opine about technology, despite the fact that I am on a computer from ten to fourteen hours a day. But what I do think is that my present involvement in digitizing thousands of records every week puts me in the position of having my actions consistent with what I am advocating. I am not just talking about the revolution, I am fully involved in it.

Now, the statistics are probably correct. Older people do not embrace technology at the same rate as those who are younger. But despite the fact that almost all the genealogical promotional activities are aimed at youth and younger individuals, I am still finding and seeing only a very small involvement by the other named generations. So the effect is that much of genealogy is still being taught and promoted by and for people who do not use or understand technology.

If you think that you know what is going on, tell me how many court records from the state of Maryland are online in one form or another? My guess is that no one really knows, but that more records are being added every day. Granted there are still geographic areas that have few online records, but those records have never been available even to those who travel and try to gain access.

Right now, for the average person in the United States and much of the English speaking world and most of the Spanish speaking world also, that person can go online today and find as much as four or five generations of their family on some, if not all, of their family lines. There are always exceptions for foundlings, adoptions and etc. but the reality is that the English and Spanish speaking countries (outside of Spain itself) are heavily represented in online collections.

If you want to do genealogy today, get online and start looking. By the way, I will continue not being silent.

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

New Pedigree View Mode for MyHeritage Family Trees

https://blog.myheritage.com/2018/04/new-feature-pedigree-view-for-family-trees/?utm_campaign=Pedigree%20View&utm_source=email

For some time now, I have been wondering why MyHeritage did not offer a traditional pedigree view for its family tree. My wait is now over. Here is the announcement from the MyHeritage Blog.
You asked for it, and we developed it for you! This week, we released a Pedigree View mode for family trees, created in response to popular demand from our users. Many users considered the Pedigree View as their most wanted feature on MyHeritage, so we are delighted to fill this need. 
A Pedigree View includes a root person and his/her ancestors. It does not show siblings, spouses, or anyone else who is not a direct ancestor. In this view you can navigate to anyone else in your tree and view their pedigree as well. 
The new Pedigree View doesn’t replace the current view, which we call Family View. It comes in addition, and you can toggle between the two and a third view, which is a List.
Here is a screenshot of the pedigree view using my Grandfather as the beginning person.



Rather than have all the detailed information in the family tree, MyHeritage has a sidebar that provides the details and links to other family members.

From my standpoint as an experienced genealogist, this is a big step forward in making the program more usable. However, if you are used to the family view then that is still available.


There are really three different views available, Family View, Pedigree View, and List. Here is a screenshot of the List.