Some people eat, sleep and chew gum, I do genealogy and write...

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Google moves to abandon Picasa

The Internet is buzzing with news that Google has decided to abandon the desktop photo tool Picasa. For a number of years, Picasa has been a useful tool for finding and organizing photos on desktop computers, now, the product is to be abandoned in favor of Google Photos. I rely on Picasa to tame the huge collection of photos I store on my computer's hard drive and attached hard drives. One of the most valuable of the Picasa tools is the ability to tag people using a face recognition feature. It also allowed users to rename and sort photo on the user's computer. These features, including some of the fairly sophisticated editing tools in Picasa are now on the cutting table.

Google Photos is a weak substitute even with the ability to store "unlimited"copies of lower quality photos online. I archive my files at the original quality supported by the camera. In the case of many of my photos taken with my Canon Camera, I have rather large RAW files. If I want to use Google Photos, I must compromise the quality of my photos, even the JPEGs and upload a compressed version. Otherwise, I must utilize the storage incorporated into Google Drive and limited to a total of 1 TB. This may seem like a lot, but I will now seriously consider moving to a more reasonable online storage program. For example, allows unlimited photo storage to Amazon Prime members and we already have Amazon Prime for the advantage in the savings on shipping costs and other services.

As far as sorting, renaming and moving photos, I can do that with either Adobe Lightroom or Adobe Bridge which comes with Adobe Photoshop. But neither of these Adobe programs have facial recognition.

Recently, the genealogy community was notified of the abandonment of Family Tree Maker by The excuse given, in part, was the move from desktop to cloud services. Picasa was already a cloud service but storage on Google's servers was optional. Now with the move away from Picasa, there is no longer an option. You will not see Google Photos without a network connection. Here is a quote from the Google announcement:
If you have photos or videos in a Picasa Web Album today, the easiest way to still access, modify and share most of that content is to log in to Google Photos, and all your photos and videos will already be there. Using Google Photos, you can continue to upload and organize your memories, as well as enjoy other great benefits like better ways to search and share your images.

However, for those of you who don’t want to use Google Photos or who still want to be able to view specific content, such as tags, captions or comments, we will be creating a new place for you to access your Picasa Web Albums data. That way, you will still be able to view, download, or delete your Picasa Web Albums, you just won’t be able to create, organize or edit albums (you would now do this in Google Photos).
This is not exactly correct. I do not have all the thousands of photos I now organize on my computer using Picasa online. What Google does have is a copy of photos I have uploaded using my iPhone or some of the photos used in my blogs. Even with my Google Fiber connection here in Provo, Utah, it would take more than an entire day to simply back up my existing photos. 

Just as with Family Tree Make, the desktop programs do not automatically stop working. Here is the explanation from Google:
As of March 15, 2016, we will no longer be supporting the Picasa desktop application. For those who have already downloaded this—or choose to do so before this date—it will continue to work as it does today, but we will not be developing it further, and there will be no future updates. If you choose to switch to Google Photos, you can continue to upload photos and videos using the desktop uploader at
These new developments with and Google clearly illustrate the limitations of relying solely on companies whose internal business decisions may affect your data.  For the foreseeable future, there is still a need to provide you own local backup storage on external hard disks. Online storage is only one more way to backup your data and not the ultimate solution.


  1. I thought I wasn't using Picasa, but I poked around the internet to figure out if I ever have. It was a surprise to discover that all the pictures that I've uploaded onto my blog which is a Google Blogger product seem to be housed on Picasa. What will happen to the way pictures appear on our blogs? Will they disappear? Will Google move them?

    1. There are the photos on your own computer hard drive or drives and nothing happens to them at all. Any photos you uploaded to Google either through a blog or using Picasa now are supposed to appear in Google Photos.

    2. I was aware that my Blogger images were in a picasaweb album, and I have asked where they will be later -- no good response yet. However, the resolution issue is a concern for me. Many are technical diagrams that contain text which must be readable, as opposed to photographs. Do you know, James, whether it's a resolution limit or a size limit?

    3. Google is not being specific. I guess the only way to tell is to add the same photo to a Google Photos album and to a Google Drive folder and then download the two and compare. I will try that and see what happens.

  2. I use Flickr for my off-site photo storage. All users have 1TB storage at no charge and all images area ored at their original size. Users also control licensing and who can view their images. You can learn more about Flickr at

    1. Thanks for the comment. There are probably a lot of different options.